Bazaar sprint, day 1
Ok, so the first day of the sprint is over.
It started much earlier than I'm used to (9am sharp), and I believe we left around 7pm, mainly because we needed food (and beer) pretty badly.
Meeting everyone has been absolutely great, and people are just very friendly and helpful in all kinds of ways.
The hotel Canonical has put us in is overwhelmingly nice, the offices have a very friendy environment, and the view of London is priceless.
A lot of brainstorming was done today, and we tried to start from the top by dumping all the adoptions blockers we perceive, and prioritizing them by importance.
Then we split up into two groups to discuss two major blockers, IDE Integration and Network Performance.
Both discussions seemed to be quite productive and triggered more than a few patches sent to be merged.
For a general sum up of the day, the IDE Integration meeting basically went around adding XML output to bzr's core (it's already available as a plugin) , as it seems to be the best language-agnostic approach. Some discussion about performance was delayed to a further discussion.
The network performance details escape me a bit, but the general idea was that the smart protocol has much room to improve, and it didn't seem to need a terrible amount of work, it just needs to be done.
And finally, unifying under one storage format was heavily discussed, with a few approaches available which would reduce disk space and improve performance quite a bit.
Not sure if it's of any use to anyone not present, but here are the pictures Aaron Bentley took of the whiteboards:
After we voted on what was the most important issues to us
Pages
Categories
Blogroll
Archive
- February 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
March 4th, 2008 - 09:48
Martin, can you say please what’s written about Windows on 3rd photo in the section “package availability”?
March 4th, 2008 - 09:53
Alexander:
It’s “Two roads for Windows”, which, if I remember correctly, is about there being two different installers.
March 4th, 2008 - 10:03
and what people proposed for this “problem”? they actually think it’s the problem? heh.
TortoiseBzr — is the problem.
March 4th, 2008 - 10:05
Alexander:
I’m not sure any proposition was put forward. Just that it might be confusing to new users.
TortoiseBzr was mentioned multiple times as a priority, and it seems there will be someone working on it.
March 4th, 2008 - 11:09
I have recent story about two installers for Windows. The funniest part it’s about my ex co-worker. He is hardcore Linux guy and installed bzr on Windows XP (I think first time at all, I’m installing new releases of bzr for him on Linux myself). He don’t ask me anything about better or recommended way for installing on Windows. Then he asked me why sftp transport did not work for him. Very funny.
In short:
1) he decide to install python-based variant because he fears warning about incompatibility of gui plugins, but in fact he don’t need any gui plugins
2) he installed pycrypto from tar.gz without compiler, and `python setup.py install` blame about error and he even don’t mind about this as a problem.
So, if newbie is really dummy or say idiot, it’s inevitable.
March 4th, 2008 - 19:31
Alexander–
The writeups of most of the brainstorming sessions are at http://bazaar-vcs.org/SprintLondonMarch08/Brainstorms
Dan